If you just want to normalize the flair, you can run samseg on it, ie,
samseg --i flair.mgz --o samseg.flair
in the output folder you will find a bias corrected volume


On 9/28/2022 7:42 AM, James Brown wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Dear Dr Bruce,
Thank you very much for answering my questions and for help. We highly appreciate you.

All the best
James

 1. Sigma is the smoothing kernel applied to the bias field so you can
    make it pretty large depending on how high frequency your bias
    field is (typically defined by the size of your receive coils)
 2. min_dist specifies the minimum distance from the surface a voxel
    must be for it to be considered as a potential control point
 3. I don’t see why not although I’ve never tried it. It won’t fix
    slice-specific artifacts in e.g. interlaced acquisitions
 4. We estimate the bias field from the white matter, then apply it to
    the whole brain.

I don’t think nonmax_suppress will do anything without surfaces though

Cheers

Bruce


On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 7:20 AM James Brown <jb1979...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Dear Dr Greeve and Dr Fiscle,
    I am grateful to you guiding me through this. Indeed, I can see in
    recon-all.log how Freesurfer 7.3.2 is normalizing the Flair
    images. /it uses the command below:/

    <mri_normalize -seed 1234 -sigma 0.5 -nonmax_suppress 0 -min_dist
    1 -aseg aseg.presurf.mgz -surface lh.white identity.nofile
    -surface rh.white identity.nofile FLAIR.prenorm.mgz FLAIR.norm.mgz >

    I tried to run the previous command without the flag -surface" and
    it seems to be working. using this command

    <mri_normalize -seed 1234 -sigma 0.5 -nonmax_supress 0 -min_dist 1
    --no-skull >

    I would like to inquire about the following points and I highly
    appreciate any clarification you might provide:
    1- It seems mri_normalize uses default sigma of 8 for normalizing
    T1 images and 0.5 for Flair. How far can we go up with this
    value? More specifically, when I have noticed when I increase
    sigma in noisy flair images in my dataset, I get better out
    put images in terms of less noticeable motion artifacts. Is there
    any cut off value for sigma? Can I use high values up to (e.g. 25)?
    2-  What does the flag "-min_dist" do? I tried to find information
    in mri_normalize man (i.e. help ) but I couldn't find information
    about this flag. I assume it has to do with the flag surface and
    they both should be used together?
    3- Can I use mri_normalize on 2D flair images ?
    4- Is it recommended to do whole brain normalization (white/gray
    and csf) or just white matter normalization within a mask.

    Thank you very much for all that you do.

    James





    it looks like you are using v6. In v6, the flair might not have
    been normalized
    
    On 9/23/2022 3:53 PM, Fischl, Bruce R.,PHD wrote:
    I think you need to add something like -FLAIRpial or -T2pial so
    it uses it (in which case it will first normalize it), but
    hopefully someone else can confirm

    cheers
    Bruce

    On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 2:40 PM James Brown <jb1979...@gmail.com>
    wrote:

        Dear Dr Bruce,
        Thank you very much for your guidance.
        I ran recon-all on a subject "test" using Freesurfer V6.0 and
        the following command line is reported in the "recon-all.log":

        /usr/local/freesurfer/6.0/bin/recon-all -all -qcache -i
        T1.nii.gz -flair FLAIR.nii.gz -s test

        When I search for normalization of flair, I only find how
        Freesurfer normalized T1.
        I searched for "nonmax_suppress" and it is not in the log
        file. I am just wondering what I am doing wrong. Thanks again
        for any highlights about the correct method to normalize FLAIR

        Sincerely,



        Hi JamesB

        there is T2/FLAIR normalization in recon-all if you process it
        through there. You can look for "nonmax_suppress" if you want
        to find the command line

        cheers
        Bruce

        On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 2:06 PM James Brown
        <jb1979...@gmail.com> wrote:

            Dear Freesurfer experts,
            We appreciate any advice or guidance from your community
            of professionals and experts in the field about the issue
            below.

            Thank you for your kindness.

            Dear Freesurfer experts,
            In order to normalize white matter intensity of T1 images
            and correct for bias field. We do the following steps:
            mri_convert T1.nii.gz T1.mgz
            mri_nu_correct.mni --i T1.mgz --o T1_N3.mgz --n 2
            mri_normalize -g 1 T1_N3.mgzT1_norm.mgz
            mri_convert T1_norm.mgz T1_norm.nii.gz

            We would like to apply bias field correction on FLAIR
            images then normalize white matter intensity.
            We tried N4biasfieldcorrection from ANTS but it didn't
            work as expected. Reviewing documents about
            N4biasfieldcorrection we realize that the algorithm has
            been developed to correct bias field correction in T1 not
            clear if it works on FLAIR images.

            Are the steps above valid for normalizing FLAIR images or
            can it only be applied on T1 images? I would like to send
            a "recon-all.log" file that includes the processing steps
            of FLAIR. Is there any link I can use to upload the file.
            It gets rejected every time I send it due to size
            limitations.

            We appreciate any feedback about the proper way to correct
            FLAIR images for bias fields and normalize white matter
            intensity in FLAIR images.

            Thank you
            JamesB

            On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:18 AM James Brown
            <jb1979...@gmail.com> wrote:

                Dear Freesurfer experts,
                In order to normalize white matter intensity of T1
                images and correct for bias field. We do the following
                steps:
                mri_convert T1.nii.gz T1.mgz
                mri_nu_correct.mni --i T1.mgz --o T1_N3.mgz --n 2
                mri_normalize -g 1 T1_N3.mgzT1_norm.mgz
                mri_convert T1_norm.mgz T1_norm.nii.gz

                We would like to apply bias field correction on FLAIR
                images then normalize white matter intensity.
                We tried N4biasfieldcorrection from ANTS but it didn't
                work as expected. Reviewing documents about
                N4biasfieldcorrection we realize that the
                algorithm has been developed to correct bias field
                correction in T1 not clear if it works on FLAIR images.

                Are the steps above valid for normalizing FLAIR images
                or can it only be applied on T1 images? I would like
                to send a "recon-all.log" file that includes the
                processing steps of FLAIR. Is there any link I can use
                to upload the file. It gets rejected every time I send
                it due to size limitations.

                We appreciate any feedback about the proper way to
                correct FLAIR images for bias fields and normalize
                white matter intensity in FLAIR images.

                Thank you
                JamesB


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to