I would certainly hope so :) DirectFB advertises itself as a solution for embedded systems, so that would be important. Shared objects are convenient, but they invoke performance penalties compared to static libraries.
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:44:32AM -0300, Rob Shortt wrote: > Aubin Paul wrote: > >>Well, I still have some things to update in the runtime. Most of it is > >>not too much of a problem but adding directfb support for SDL is a pain > >>and need to come up with a new way of inclidung the drivers. > > > > > >Patch SDL with the directfb patch; build Directfb as static > > > >(--enable-static --disable-shared) > > > >and link it statically. > > That is the plan. The question is, does the static libdirectfb contain > all of the drivers you build? I guess we will find out! > > -Rob > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > Freevo-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
