Dirk Nehring dixit:
>Since you are not documenting any patches, I suggest our old style
>patch format (xxx-<meaning of patch>.patch)
1. Forget it.
2. Let n0-1 do what he decides is best. We agreed that the
package/subsystem maintainer decides, and that for small
patches, the BSD style is better, and for kernel and busybox,
the OpenWrt style is better.
3. "Since you are not documenting" is not a reason to switch,
because the OpenWrt patch format isn't better without
documentation either. Rather the contrary.
And I personally would rather like the docs integrated in
the patches themselves, e.g. when I patch a .c file I could
add a /* C comment */ above the change.
But mostly, code is self-explaining. Or just ask him.
I don't see how a request to "please document everything"
is possible. Barely anything is documented, nobody has
written good docs for all of his contributions since the
creation of FreeWRT, and we all are hackers, no tutorial
writers. We all try, but your mail is more a flame in
disguise, trying to coerce him into doing like YOU want.
Besides, as n0-1 works as intern at wbx' company at the
moment, I suppose they have talked about it beforehand.
bye,
//mirabile
--
"Using Lynx is like wearing a really good pair of shades: cuts out
the glare and harmful UV (ultra-vanity), and you feel so-o-o COOL."
-- Henry Nelson, March 1999
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
