On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Russ Abbott <russ.abb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> With aggregativity defined that way, Wimsatt notes that "Very few system
> properties are aggregative."  Then what? Is the point that "emergence,
> defined as failure of aggregativity"  has now been fully characterized?
> Problem solved? I wouldn't agree with that. I think there is more to say
> than just a negative definition.
>

Very few system properties are aggregative, almost all system properties are
emergent.

There are a lot of varieties of emergence to be dealt with.  Maybe all the
short, catchy slogans have been already been taken?

An interesting example to which this approach might be applied is an ideal
> gas. Such a gas satisfies all the aggregativity conditions. Yet it has
> properties (the gas laws) that the individual components lack.
>

Ah, let me count the ways:  a simple hard sphere gas, as in Helium or Neon,
which adds finite volume and van der Waals forces to the ideal gas; the
diatomic hard sphere gas, as in Hydrogen or Oxygen, which adds rotational
angular momemtum and vibrational energy; the asymmetric diatomic gas, such
as Carbon Monoxide, where the center of gravity is off center; the polar
asymmetric diatomic gas, such as Hydrogen Fluoride, which has a positive and
negative ends; water vapor, which forms hydrogen bonded clusters; ionic
gases; molecules with internal rotational degrees of freedom;  oxygen and
ozone in equilibrium with ultra-violet radiation; smog; vog; weather; solar
wind; ....

These are all sorts of non-ideal gases; all, more or less, non-aggregate in
their properties; all, more or less, introducing new ways to be emergent;
 all, more or less, reducible to aggregate properties if you add enough
information about the particle structure and theory about inter-particle
interactions.

This helps?

-- rec --
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to