I understand that a 50x to 200x microscope is sufficient for paramecium (and other things) in pond/gutter watter.
The eyeclops claims up to 200x.. but handheld, it wouldn't be much good. Anything in a stand, with up to 200x, would be sufficient. I remember as a kid I had a simple 3 lens 'scope--I think it was 50/100/200 or something--we saw all kinds of things in the gutter water, etc. ~~J On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Nicholas Thompson < nickthomp...@earthlink.net> wrote: > Thanks for your thoughts on this, Steve. You have opened up a whole new > front, here. I assume you can’t see paramecium in pond water with these > things. I think I may have to get off that. What about yeast growing? >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
