There are lots of different kinds of time; they're useful in different
contexts. They're all "real" relative to those contexts. If the
context is too many degrees away, the associated time may be locally
correct, but is less relevant.
So I guess that would mean that travel between contexts is a kind of
"time travel".
However the kinds of time used by the rooster next door often seem
inaccessible to me.
On 3/14/13 12:50 PM, Pamela McCorduck wrote:
That "only to human beings" was my reply to the question of whether
time is relevant. It reminds me of when I do my Pilates, and my
instructor is yelling, Up, UP , UPPP!!! and I think, remember, gravity
is a weak force.
On Mar 14, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Owen Densmore <o...@backspaces.net
<mailto:o...@backspaces.net>> wrote:
Its not artificial when my alarm goes off in the morning!
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Parks, Raymond <rcpa...@sandia.gov
<mailto:rcpa...@sandia.gov>> wrote:
"Time. Time is an artificial construct. An idea based on the
theory that events occur in a linear direction, at all times.
Always forward, never back. Is the concept of time correct? Is
time relevant?"
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
