You're right, dyslexia is a bad match. Probably should have called it dysrhetorica, failure to recognize the significance of your own arguments, as evidenced by your dismay when people tell you what they heard you say.
Or maybe it should be humpty-dumpty-itis, as in the words mean just what I meant them to mean, and it is very hurtful to me that you heard them mean something else. -- rec -- On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:24 PM, glen <g...@ropella.name> wrote: > Roger Critchlow wrote at 04/03/2013 11:04 AM: > > I think it's a form of rhetorical dyslexia -- what one thinks one is > > arguing is not the argument that others hear one making. > > I don't grok the map to dyslexia. But the disconnect between the > thoughts of the sender and those of the receiver is quite clear ... the > best evidence against "psi" ... or perhaps with a softening like the > "rare earth hypothesis", that psi is so rare it may as well not exist. > > -- > =><= glen e. p. ropella > I learned how to lie well and somebody blew up > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
