This has moved so far beyond what I'm capable of thinking about that I'm lost. (Although I thank Nick for crediting me with pointing out the activity of the visual cortex. Good point -- even though it didn't occur to me to refer to it.)
I'm still way back at a much simpler question. What do Nick and Eric mean when they use the word *experience *as a noun and as a verb as Eric did in the following? *whatever you are experiencing, you are experiencing it as somehow akin to a visual experience* Eric actually wrote the preceding not too long ago. Or to take a more recent example, Nick wrote, "*I don’t think that is what John had in mind."* What does Nick mean by "had in mind"? The point is that both Eric and Nick seem to use subjective experience language fairly freely but at the same time claim that it doesn't mean anything. So my question continues to be what do they mean when they use it. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:49 PM Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote: > *“*What type of prospective employee would sacrifice personal measures of > productivity for group measures?” > > > > > > > > What I’m suggesting is that the group measures may not serve the group > benefit. By being sensitive to vulnerability and insensitive to > competitive pressures, the whole ship may be put at risk. Ok, not so much > for Google (at least today) – they can burn through a lot of money to wait > for teams to become productive. Smaller organizations may not have that > luxury. > > > > Marcus > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
