Roger,

 

Can artificial flowers learn?  

 

Are you on your boat, yet?  Beautiful day on Massachusetts bay!  See 
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/eaus/flash-vis.html

 

By the way, in support of your aphorism “layers of the atmosphere don’t mix” 
which I have been chewing on ever since you offered it:  look on the extreme 
right of the satellite loop to see the upper half of the atmosphere sliding out 
over the cold maritime layer without any interaction whatsoever.  Cool!  

 

Nick 

 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Roger Critchlow
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 7:03 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fascinating article on how AI is driving change in SEO, 
categories of AI and the Law of Accelerating Returns

 

"Artificial intelligence has the same relation to intelligence as artificial 
flowers have to flowers."  -- David Parnas

Which is even funnier now than it was in 70's or 80's when first said, because 
artificial flowers have become more and more amazing over the decades.

 

-- rec --

 

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tom Johnson <t...@jtjohnson.com 
<mailto:t...@jtjohnson.com> > wrote:

Robert:

Thanks for the pointers at the end of your remarks to the interesting articles. 
 I wonder, too, if someone could come up with parallel "paragon websites."  
That is, here's WebMD.  and displayed alongside the "best" critics or 
alternatives to that site.

 

TJ




  
<https://mailtrack.io/trace/mail/fb0c0c961737525a41d2d2e252724b94481a7a68341037.png>
 





============================================
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism   --     Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482 <tel:505.577.6482> (c)                                    
505.473.9646 <tel:505.473.9646> (h)
Society of Professional Journalists <http://www.spj.org>    -   Region 9 
<http://www.spj.org/region9.asp>  Director
Check out It's The People's Data 
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Its-The-Peoples-Data/1599854626919671> 

http://www.jtjohnson.com <http://www.jtjohnson.com/>                    
t...@jtjohnson.com <mailto:t...@jtjohnson.com> 
============================================

 

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Robert Wall <wallrobe...@gmail.com 
<mailto:wallrobe...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Hi Tom,

 

Interesting article about Google and their foray [actually a Blitzkrieg, as 
they are buying up all of the brain trust in this area] into the world of 
machine learning presumably to improve the search customer experience.  Could 
their efforts actually have unintended consequences for both the search 
customer and the marketing efforts of the website owners? It is interesting to 
consider. For example, for the former case, Google picking WebMD as the paragon 
website for the healthcare industry flies in the face of my own experience and, 
say, this New York Times Magazine article: A Prescription for Fear 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/06/magazine/06FOB-Medium-t.html?login=email&_r=0>
  (Feb 2011).  Will this actually make WebMD the de facto paragon in the minds 
of the searchers?  For the latter, successful web marketing becomes 
increasingly subject to the latest Google search algorithms instead of the 
previously more expert in-house marketing departments. Of course, this is the 
nature of SEO--to game the algorithms to attract better rankings.  But, it 
seems those in-house marketing departments will need to up their game:

 

In other ways, things are a bit harder. The field of SEO will continue to 
become extremely technical. Analytics and big data are the order of the day, 
and any SEO that isn’t familiar with these approaches has a lot of catching up 
to do. Those of you who have these skills can look forward to a big payday.

 

Also, with respect to those charts anticipating exponential growth for AGI 
technology--even eclipsing human intelligence by mid-century--there is much 
reasoning to see this as overly optimistic [see, for example, Hubert Dreyfus' 
critique of Good Old Fashion AI: "What Computers Can't Do"].  These charts kind 
of remind me of the "ultraviolet catastrophe" around the end of the 19th 
century. There are physical limitations that may well tamp progress and keep it 
to ANI.  With respect to AGI, there have been some pointed challenges to this 
"Law of Accelerating Returns."

 

On this point, I thought this article in AEON titled "Creative Blocks: The very 
laws of physics imply that artificial intelligence must be possible. What’s 
holding us up? 
<https://aeon.co/essays/how-close-are-we-to-creating-artificial-intelligence>  
(Oct 2012)" is on point concerning the philosophical and epistemological road 
blocks.  This one, titled "Where do minds belong? 
<https://aeon.co/essays/intelligent-machines-might-want-to-become-biological-again>
  (Mar 2016)" discusses the technological roadblocks in an insightful, highly 
speculative, but entertaining manner.

 

Nonetheless, this whole discussion is quite intriguing, no matter your stance, 
hopes, or fears. 😎

 

Cheers,

 

Robert

 

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Tom Johnson <t...@jtjohnson.com 
<mailto:t...@jtjohnson.com> > wrote:

See 
http://techcrunch.com/2016/06/04/artificial-intelligence-is-changing-seo-faster-than-you-think/?ncid=tcdaily
 

 

Among other points: "...why doing regression analysis over every site, without 
having the context of the search result that it is in, is supremely flawed."

TJ


============================================
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism   --     Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482 <tel:505.577.6482> (c)                                    
505.473.9646 <tel:505.473.9646> (h)
Society of Professional Journalists <http://www.spj.org>    -   Region 9 
<http://www.spj.org/region9.asp>  Director
Check out It's The People's Data 
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Its-The-Peoples-Data/1599854626919671> 

http://www.jtjohnson.com <http://www.jtjohnson.com/>                    
t...@jtjohnson.com <mailto:t...@jtjohnson.com> 
============================================





Sent with MailTrack 
<https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=jtjohnson...@gmail.com&idSignature=22>
 



 


 
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
 

Virus-free.  
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
 www.avast.com 

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to