"I *did* enjoy hearing Chomsky answer this question at a NAFTA talk in ABQ 15 
years ago with the simple statement "Socially Responsible 
Investing is a contradiction in terms".   There was a loud titter among 
the roughly 50% students and a deafening silence among the other 50% 
Yuppie/Academic/Retireds."

What exactly is the claim?   That property is theft?    That all investments 
ought to be public investments?  Or is it a weaker claim that, say, people or 
organizations should not be able to float along living off `earnings' from 
interest?   I think it is good if candidates just come right out with that as 
part of their platform.   Likewise, salary caps for doctors, lawyers, and so 
on.    It would take decades for it to gain much support, I think -- people 
have too much investment in American Dream type fantasies -- but it is worth 
proposing.

Marcus

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to