Well, Marcus, 

 

So, the question is , “Should we do what we can do, no matter how lame or 
ineffectual it might seem?”  Or, should we pull back, “move to Spain’, and 
leave it to others, “the politicians”, to lower themselves to do what needs to 
be done.  Isn’t this one of the things the Quakers get right:  You don’t worry 
about what others are doing.  You do it right, yourself.  You act as you would 
have others act?  

 

The answer would seem to depend on whether each one of us thinks that he or she 
is going to be touched by this thing.  This is where, I think, my libertarian 
friends (Hi, Guys!) get it wrong.  They think it’s possible to step aside, to 
lift one’s skirts about the flood of muck that is  about to descend upon us -- 
survive it all, listening to jazz (say) and eating canned food in the green 
painted walls of their condo in the depths of their converted missile silo, 
with flat-screen “windows” looking out on the surrounding countryside. 

 

“When they came for the immigrants, I didn’t do anything because I was not an 
immigrant”  etc. 

 

I think we have to figure out what we can do, and begin to do it.  

 

Nick 

 

 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 12:12 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [[Narcissism Again]again]

 

It is worth noting he’s living in Spain.  

 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> > on 
behalf of "Robert J. Cordingley" <rob...@cirrillian.com 
<mailto:rob...@cirrillian.com> >
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com 
<mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Date: Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 11:34 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com 
<mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [[Narcissism Again]again]

 

The Washington Post has an interesting essay from a Venezuelan on what to do 
and mostly what not to do.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/01/27/in-venezuela-we-couldnt-stop-chavez-dont-make-the-same-mistakes-we-did

Robert C

 

 

On 1/28/17 11:21 AM, Nick Thompson wrote:

Ok Steve, 

 

The only reason to accept responsibility is to Take Charge. 

 

I have been able to think of only one concrete thing that I can do with my 
limited set of skills:  Write Apple and tell them to stop calling new products 
“I-this” and “I-that.”  When are they going to release the WE-phone.  

 

You must have something in your tool kit more effective than that!

 

Nick 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Steven A Smith
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 9:38 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group  
<mailto:friam@redfish.com> <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [[Narcissism Again]again]

 





What can WE hobbits do? 

Scratch our hairy knuckles and indulge in second dinnerses?

Fun aside, I DO appreciate your sentiment here and agree that the Narcissist in 
Chief is at least partly a (focused) reflection of our own worst qualities, and 
*perhaps* if we tend our own garden even a little, it will help with the 
greater picture.   

- Candide



 

Nick 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Jochen Fromm
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:39 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group  
<mailto:friam@redfish.com> <friam@redfish.com>; Friam  
<mailto:Friam@redfish.com> <Friam@redfish.com>
Cc: penny thompson  <mailto:penny.thomp...@earthlink.net> 
<penny.thomp...@earthlink.net>; 'Bruce Simon'  <mailto:bjs...@yahoo.com> 
<bjs...@yahoo.com>; 'Dix McComas'  <mailto:dixmccom...@gmail.com> 
<dixmccom...@gmail.com>; 'Grant Franks'  <mailto:grantfra...@earthlink.net> 
<grantfra...@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [[Narcissism Again]again]

 

Yes, agree. Trump’s point of view is “Whatever I can win with is true.”  And if 
he wins with what we call “a lie”, it is true for him. Exactly.

 

If you ask how we can counter and resist him, then I would say peaceful 
protests are the right way. The women's march was impressive, and the rebellion 
of the social media managers from the national parks is really refreshing. Who 
would have thought that the national parks would strike back? Like Treebeard 
who becomes alive.

 

In JK Rowling's novels it is the little creatures like the house elves that 
beat the evil in the end. In Tolkien's Lord of the Rings it is the Hobbits that 
beat the evil enemy. I think in this case people like Ken Bone are the Hobbits 
of the 21st century. The modern Hobbits are adverage midwestern guys who 
support Mr. T-Rump and his "party" on Twitter and hope to get a bit rich and 
famous along the way.

 

People like Ken Bone are like Frodo the Hobbit, Mr. T-Rump is Sauron and Jack 
Dorsey is the ringwraith. Will Ken Bone throw the ring into Mt. Doom, i.e. will 
he stop following Trump on Twitter and/or quit Twitter completely? If we all 
stop following and listening him he loses his power. This includes the senior 
Republican politicians who do not speak up against him because they hope for a 
job in his administration.

 

Cheers,

 

Jochen

 

 

Sent from my Tricorder

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Nick Thompson <nickthomp...@earthlink.net 
<mailto:nickthomp...@earthlink.net> > 

Date: 1/28/17 01:57 (GMT+01:00) 

To: Friam <Friam@redfish.com <mailto:Friam@redfish.com> > 

Cc: penny thompson <penny.thomp...@earthlink.net 
<mailto:penny.thomp...@earthlink.net> >, 'Bruce Simon' <bjs...@yahoo.com 
<mailto:bjs...@yahoo.com> >, 'Dix McComas' <dixmccom...@gmail.com 
<mailto:dixmccom...@gmail.com> >, 'Grant Franks' <grantfra...@earthlink.net 
<mailto:grantfra...@earthlink.net> > 

Subject: [FRIAM] [[Narcissism Again]again] 

 

Hi everybody,

I kind of got buried by the list last week, but we seem to keep coming back to 
this topic, even when we are  talking about globalism. 

So.  Let me just share one thought.  I have said a hundred times that I think 
the great achievement of the Right in my life time has been to problematize 
(Ugh!) the Deweyan consensus of the 1950’s  One of the elements of that 
consensus was that there is a truth of most matters and if we gather 
inclusively, talk calmly, reason closely, study carefully, investigate 
rigorously,  we will, together , come to it.  What was, at the time of my 
coming of age, the shared foundation of argument, became over last 50 years, a 
position in the argument.  The alternative to this Deweyan position seems to be 
something like, “There is no truth of the matter; there is only the exercise of 
power.  He who wins the argument, by whatever means, wins the truth.  Truth is 
not something that is arrived at; it is won.”

So.  My sense of trump is that in fact, he is not lying.  On the contrary, he 
does not share the view of discourse that makes lying a possibility.  From 
Trump’s point of view, “Whatever I can win with is true.”  Hence, if he wins 
with what we call “a lie”, it is true. 

I feel we are straying along the edge of some Nietzschean chasm here.  
Unfortunately  I haven’t read any Nietzsche .  A brief rummage in Wikipedia, 
led me to The Parable of the Madman 
<http://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/nietzsche-madman.asp> . And THAT led me to 
wonder if the TV Series, Madmen <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_Men> , about 
marketing execs in the 60’s, was written with Nietzsche in mind.  In any case, 
if there is ever a domain in which the truth is that which wins, it would be 
marketing. 

So, if we are going to counter Trump, it cannot be by demonstrating that he 
lies.  It has to be by demonstrating that liars don’t win. 

Heavy lift.

Nick

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ 
<http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 

 






============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

 





============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

 

-- 
Cirrillian 
Web Design & Development
Santa Fe, NM
http://cirrillian.com
281-989-6272 (cell)
Member Design Corps of Santa Fe
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to