I mean it in a sense you know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duality_(mathematics)
I suspect you'll take issue with the way I'm using the term. Everyone always takes issue with everything I say. 8^) But I'm not really relying on the term for my argument about the expressibility of hier- and heter-archies. So if I'm using the term wrong, feel free to suggest a different one and I'll use that. On 1/3/19 1:48 PM, lrudo...@meganet.net wrote: > Glen says to Nick: > >> I have no idea why you used the word "duality". > > I am very afraid that Nick's use (is metaphorical and) can probably be > traced back to having read/heard someone writing about "the wave/particle > duality" or the like. > > I'm not sure what *you* mean by duality: the rest of your post, which I > excised without thinking, makes it clear you have a definite, and precise, > and *not* metaphorical meaning for it, but I don't think it's a meaning I > know; and I'm doubtful that Nick, even if he's seen/heard you using it and > has had it explained to him, can explain it to *me* so that I'd understand > it...would you mind doing so (you can point me towards a reference instead > of rehashing it yourself!)? -- ☣ uǝlƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
