Among the many reasons email is obsolete is the ability of other tools to "pin" 
a post so that it's easily found later on. In principle, the Mailman list page 
could do this. But it's comparatively awkward. Piling more into the footer can 
play the same role, but since few posters clean up their posts (e.g. deleting 
the repeated footer), such piling makes sifting through contributions awkward, 
as well.

Anyway, I'd like to "pin" this post somewhere. I think it's fantastic to make 
such explicit predictions, similar to those experiment sites where you have to 
submit your design for review, then conduct the experiment, then submit your 
results:

https://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2020/04/06/filling-in-the-scientific-record-the-importance-of-negative-and-null-results/

And it follows nicely with the (painfully slow) admission that knowledge comes 
through failure, not success: 
https://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2020/04/06/filling-in-the-scientific-record-the-importance-of-negative-and-null-results/

For now, I'll simply install a reminder in Tempus Dictum's Discord to come back 
and look at Dave's prediction in late June.

On 5/11/20 7:42 AM, Prof David West wrote:
> The COVID-19 pandemic will end, at least in the US, by mid-June, 2020.
> 
> This assertion is premised on making a distinction between the biological and 
> the perceptual.
> 
> The virus is not going away, a vaccine may or may not be found and made 
> widely available, and treatments that reduce severity and death rate may or 
> may not be soon at hand. Hot spots will continue to flare. Model-based 
> prognostications will be confirmed.  And none of this will matter.
> 
> A radical shift in perception from "we're all going to die" to "I have next 
> to zero chance of severe illness or death" is reaching a tipping point and a 
> catastrophic (mathematical sense of the word) change from one to the other is 
> imminent.
> 
> "Science" will quickly confirm (justify / rationalize) this shift  — after 
> all, my individual risk is 150,000 / 300,000,000 or "pretty damned small."
> 
> Politicians will quickly cave to this new perceptual reality and 
> socio-economic restrictions will collapse.
> 
> The percentage of the population that wear masks (just one example of a 
> behavioral phenomenon) will roughly equal the number that fastidiously fasten 
> their seat belts; but this and similar behaviors will mitigate the the 
> infection/death rate.
> 
> Covid will be PERCEIVED to be no worse than the flu, the death rate will 
> become "acceptable," and the current media "hysteria" will fade away.
> 
> There will be a segment of the populace — mostly the affluent elderly and 
> individuals who have acquired money/influence/notoriety the past few months — 
> who will argue against these changes but their objections will be quickly 
> countered with, "why should I suffer all kinds of consequences — ones you do 
> not share — to cater to your fears or your ego?"
> 
> None of the above should be interpreted as anything except a simple 
> observation / prediction.


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to