Moving this to another thread.

A written language was not necessary for, not the generative cause for urban 
civilizations. Written languages existed before the "great civilizations" 
arose, but only a few individuals were fluent in their use. This remained true 
for a long time after those civilizations arose. Plato, in the midst of a 
"great civilization," bemoaned the 'invention' and use of written language. 
From Phaedrus:

*"And so it is that you by reason of your tender regard for the writing that is 
your offspring have declared the very opposite of its true effect. If men learn 
this, it will implant forgetfulness in their souls. They will cease to exercise 
memory because they rely on that which is written, calling things to 
remembrance no longer from within themselves, but by means of external marks.**
*
*
*
*    What you have discovered is a recipe not for memory, but for reminder. And 
it is no true wisdom that you offer your disciples, but only the semblance of 
wisdom, for by telling them of many things without teaching them you will make 
them seem to know much while for the most part they know nothing. And as men 
filled not with wisdom but with the conceit of wisdom they will be a burden to 
their fellows.**
*
*
*
*You know, Phaedrus, that is the strange thing about writing, which makes it 
truly correspond to painting. The painter’s products stand before us as though 
they were alive. But if you question them, they maintain a most majestic 
silence. It is the same with written words. They seem to talk to you as though 
they were intelligent, but if you ask them anything about what they say from a 
desire to be instructed they go on telling just the same thing forever."*

Homer also was against the adoption of writing.

IM(not so)HO, Plato was right, reliance on and glorification of written 
language has harmed humanity. From a very different perspective, Ian 
McGilchrist (*The Master and His Emissary,* *The Matter With Things,* volume 
one and two) written language and math, have brought about a "left-brain 
dominance" in how humans think and interact with the world—to our (humanity) 
great detriment.

Particularly galling to me is the deprecation and dismissal of any human 
knowledge, wisdom, experience ... that cannot be reduced to mere words and 
abstract symbols. The epitome of this is the conceit that AI—which is nothing 
more than the algorithmic manipulation of abstract meaningless tokens is 
somehow "equivalent" to human intelligence.

davew

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to