> I do appreciate some of the responses here, including Glen's meta-narrative 
> and Nick's tease of "GPT nailed it right away!" though that does have the 
> taste of shaming the rest of us (as if GPT IS one of us?) for not being as 
> broadly trained on obscure facts and patterns as GPT is?   
> 
I’m sorry if I missed it, but did Nick include the “explanation” by which GPT 
“got” a number?

I could imagine a string of reasoning along the lines of:
— Nick intends to put this on FRIAM as a trick question
— Probably nobody would guess the number 1 as the next answer in the sequence, 
so that must be the number Nick wants
— ergo: the next number in the sequence is 1.  QED.

Was that the reasoning?

Eric




> On Sep 11, 2025, at 0:57, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Yes. Thank you. I was beginning to fear i had asked an unfair q.  Gpt got it 
>> on the first pass and then went on to say some interesting things about 
>> mathematics and semantics
> i think questions of this type *are* implicitly "unfair" (whatever that 
> means).   Without attributing malice to Nick, it is of the type of question 
> known as "trick", either deliberately misleading gesturing in an arbitrary 
> (mis)direction or simply deliberately obscuring/withholding context which 
> might otherwisemake the question "obvious".   
> 
> I'm not a big fan of the whole domain of "trick questions" generally up to 
> and including highly respected (e.g. NYT) crossword puzzles, "Trivial 
> Pursuit" or "Jeapordy".   This might seem odd as I *am* a fan of esoteric 
> knowledge... perhaps just not using it as tool for "getting one over on 
> others" (still not impugning Nick as having intended such).
> 
> I do appreciate some of the responses here, including Glen's meta-narrative 
> and Nick's tease of "GPT nailed it right away!" though that does have the 
> taste of shaming the rest of us (as if GPT IS one of us?) for not being as 
> broadly trained on obscure facts and patterns as GPT is?   
> 
> Grumbling about "trick questions" aside, Nick's claim of: "interesting things 
> about mathematics and semantics" is compelling to me.   I can't help but want 
> to know what that actually grounds out as?
> 
> I'm wondering if GPT calls this question out as a "category ambiguity" 
> (ambiguity being.a subcategory of error)?   I could dive in with GPT and 
> discuss these sequences and everyone's guesses, etc... but despite my 
> fascination with LLM-relations I don't want to compound my already 
> over/mis-use and speed the paving of the planet with Data Centers beyond what 
> I'm already doing with GPT.  Like noodling (yet) better/more-subtle methods 
> for using natural materials to build an a addition onto my home (just in time 
> for a massive data-center blob to grow, looming over the horizon, inevitably 
> sucking my humble adobe-abode into "the Matrix"?
> 
> - grumbleSteve
> 
> 
> 
> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
> --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,1vPovkYJaRstrscbpM2I84tT91PSbCdsEKqJaNmDYajwbAHwfQTn_dMxqns1Y8jo6-QFjN7M0LNH0x7jsNGITtjMkja4YuMrilfLLVuW7rTkmjGhffjk&typo=1
> to (un)subscribe 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,yjoqkLEYEmX90sK_O6AjjRo9ieLfUsNAPOpWOiXfaelnBh4vMYdoUUZ66O3DfczM5HxwX3qUd40MzDU1o2cppef1U3v7QE2T2giz016i2l469IyFLA,,&typo=1
> FRIAM-COMIC 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,LmsgosFzEh0KGWf_Q6UnH0LOxLT6yR_7EunysEzmw_GbhEX5wWwOU6MLVNaYSd4N2qukWMmA7GEB-BHBHw71Wloaz3G45XL8e-rTEOm5HVYHcUUGabQ,&typo=1
> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,XFit9QjZekz6BhR-iyOl9CtbYnA5ZnzXpuyBeG-Yj-IIatJxvAs691IxaQk3yk99ylUKbPlQ-_Jf41peRVbmBthugM39l0r5sxV5Nt-mkYQvgAg,&typo=1
>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to