Three hours and fourty-seven minutes and fourty-nine seconds?

When I think of how much I already fail to get done in that amount of time 
every day….

> On Sep 11, 2025, at 3:07, glen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Well done! She's an infinite font of rant. Have you seen her rant about 
> Picard? https://youtu.be/MdLHKdn0JTY?si=wEEzBJTGP2Jsh4T2
> 
> On 9/10/25 11:01 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>> Has she got any other topics she needs to saw at?  Maybe the transporters in 
>> Star Trek don't seem plausible to her?
>> Then she fast forwards what was surely an IQ demodulator!
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of glen
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2025 10:17 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Nick being irritating --
>> I found this entertaining, like all her videos:
>> Part 6: You cannot hear radio waves.
>> https://youtu.be/0j4_-7rwWjE?si=9XKhErO03LQLPgvp&t=3910
>> I like the genre "noise". But some of my friends who are true fans have some 
>> perverse tastes in music. E.g. a couple of them *hate* what they call 
>> "noodling" ... like Joe Satriani or Yngwie Malmsteen ... mostly sounds like 
>> they're playing scales. They argue that chords and rhythm guitar, as well as 
>> drums, are way more interesting/entertaining to them. I find that somewhat 
>> contradictory. It just seems like you can't really be a fan of noise without 
>> liking noodling, at least when it's appropriate ... not gratuitous. But 
>> apophenia's a thing. So maybe noise is an ultimate art form, where the 
>> artist can intend anything she wants without constraining the audience in 
>> their imputation?
>> Composers *think* they're generating these things. But most mathematicians 
>> are Platonic. Maybe the composers are actually *discovering* music as 
>> opposed to generating it?
>> On 9/10/25 8:57 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes. Thank you. I was beginning to fear i had asked an unfair q.  Gpt got 
>>>> it on the first pass and then went on to say some interesting things about 
>>>> mathematics and semantics
>>> 
>>> i think questions of this type *are* implicitly "unfair" (whatever that 
>>> means).   Without attributing malice to Nick, it is of the type of question 
>>> known as "trick", either deliberately misleading gesturing in an arbitrary 
>>> (mis)direction or simply deliberately obscuring/withholding context which 
>>> might otherwisemake the question "obvious".
>>> 
>>> I'm not a big fan of the whole domain of "trick questions" generally up to 
>>> and including highly respected (e.g. NYT) crossword puzzles, "Trivial 
>>> Pursuit" or "Jeapordy".   This might seem odd as I *am* a fan of esoteric 
>>> knowledge... perhaps just not using it as tool for "getting one over on 
>>> others" (still not impugning Nick as having intended such).
>>> 
>>> I do appreciate some of the responses here, including Glen's meta-narrative 
>>> and Nick's tease of "GPT nailed it right away!" though that does have the 
>>> taste of shaming the rest of us (as if GPT IS one of us?) for not being as 
>>> broadly trained on obscure facts and patterns as GPT is?
>>> 
>>> Grumbling about "trick questions" aside, Nick's claim of: "interesting 
>>> things about mathematics and semantics" is compelling to me.   I can't help 
>>> but want to know what that actually grounds out as?
>>> 
>>> I'm wondering if GPT calls this question out as a "category ambiguity" 
>>> (/ambiguity/ being.a subcategory of /error/)?  I could dive in with GPT and 
>>> discuss these sequences and everyone's guesses, etc... but despite my 
>>> fascination with LLM-relations I don't want to compound my already 
>>> over/mis-use and speed the paving of the planet with Data Centers beyond 
>>> what I'm already doing with GPT.  Like noodling (yet) better/more-subtle 
>>> methods for using natural materials to build an a addition onto my home 
>>> (just in time for a massive data-center blob to grow, looming over the 
>>> horizon, inevitably sucking my humble adobe-abode into "the Matrix"?
>>> 
>>> - grumbleSteve
> 
> 
> -- 
> ¡sıɹƎ ןıɐH ⊥ ɐןןǝdoɹ ǝ uǝןƃ
> Ἐν τῷ ἄλλοις αἴλουροι τὰς ἐχθροὺς ὀξύνονται, ἐγὼ τοὺς φίλους μου ὀξύνομαι ἵνα 
> σῶμαι αὐτούς.
> 
> 
> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
> --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,9e1RWihkcvIaDJfX-Iyoh5wb2-f4-Li0EIOZhL3MY8HaqU9mhOE0jrKqEWmk9Cg34SbQLqjMRLj66jtqmCnNSO1Bfy9HzUIw0Zyn5EeuznNWpKhM47WEkEFmYHY,&typo=1
> to (un)subscribe 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,R02rcNlNMV5g4b9E8xsIlH64swQG0x-TvOcQWBjKEjef6oetqAdn9O9N1L55daMTNPBQpyqIvCSUMl6VDzxqFJyxJBbPMpDy1Ofrk0St&typo=1
> FRIAM-COMIC 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,VeEVWlmBq7Ag22qhfEjilY41AAqxJUklMM5ZZldTrmzVmX16oapL94M2g3HELht71REulUqhsJJ-WN8EeGDT1_zouPb2frEdBYzllQdLtmk,&typo=1
> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,bBQiu33HrQkGwcuoIb_mzBWb_MIf6O7fWd5KhokNCBCRYoFdJwRajFnMUuKrbGbkj1Zk1Cawsc4Z2kfzTNkedElRbBOCVnIvdetscg4QVftY&typo=1
> 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to