Alex Smith schrieb: > Hi all! > > Crazy and I would both like to see a new init system in Frugalware 0.6 > to completely replace sysvinit - it is unmaintained, outdated, and > lots of things in it could be implemented better. > > There are several possible options: > 1) InitNG (http://www.initng.org) - Advantages: no symlinks, > dependency based, very fast bootup. Disadvantages: quite big, no > localization support (this could be hacked in though) > > 2) Runit (http://smarden.org/runit/) - Advantages: service supervision > based. Disadvantages: each service requires a directory and 2 files, > run and finish (I think that would be *VERY* annoying to maintain)
Again no. You *NEED* one folder the second one is *the symlink to let runit know that daemon is ON*. > > 3) Write our own init - Advantages: It will work exactly how we want, > we'll be able to implement it to work perfectly with Frugalware, and > we'll easily be able to change things when we need to. Disadvantages: > Will take a long time to do > > 4) Stick with sysvinit - Some people might not want to change :P > Advantages: No need to change all the packages using init scripts, we > keep the same behaviour. Disadvantages: Outdated crap, we'll have to > replace it eventually > > I personally choose 3. What does everyone think on this matter? :) Well 2 or 3 :P > > Bye! > Alex > crazy _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
