On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:29:31AM +0000, Dave Crossland wrote: > > What they are suggesting is option IV which is recreate youtube with a > > free format, which still includes Option a, which fails for the same reason. > > Gnash will enable a youtube with a free format using the Flash > architecture but 100% free software, because it spans the Gnash > runtime and Cygnal, a replacement for Flash Media Server.
But the original point I was elluding to was that YouTube is really, really, really, really, really, smegging big. It's not going anywhere soon. It's all well and good waxing lyrical about how X or Y suggestions would work if only YouTube used this format or that format, but it's not very constructive because YouTube don't do any of that yet. Gnash works here and now for using YouTube and that's vitally important. -- Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/> "Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
