On 08/01/2008, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:29:31AM +0000, Dave Crossland wrote: > > > What they are suggesting is option IV which is recreate youtube with a > > > free format, which still includes Option a, which fails for the same > > > reason. > > > > Gnash will enable a youtube with a free format using the Flash > > architecture but 100% free software, because it spans the Gnash > > runtime and Cygnal, a replacement for Flash Media Server. > > But the original point I was elluding to was that YouTube is really, > really, really, really, really, smegging big. It's not going anywhere soon. > > It's all well and good waxing lyrical about how X or Y suggestions > would work if only YouTube used this format or that format, but it's > not very constructive because YouTube don't do any of that yet. > > Gnash works here and now for using YouTube and that's vitally important.
+1 :-) -- Regards, Dave _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
