On 9/30/2011 11:59 AM, adam wrote: > "Cause them to face punishment in what country? Wouldn't they have to > extradite them? What if their extradition treaty didn't cover > cybercrime, or they didn't have one with the US?" > > I'm not sure you understood the example, and the mixing and matching > you're doing here doesn't really work. If they're being "extradited" > for violating a court order - it wouldn't very well be cybercrime, > would it? No. Secondly, in the example provided, the service > [provider] resides in the same place as the court handling the case - > so there'd be no need for extradition in the first place. Third, If > you take things out of context, twist them and then question them - of > course they're not going to make much sense. > > Lastly, you're talking about the prosecution of such crimes. That's > entirely different than a court ordering that X service turn over Y > information about Z user. Its possible i misread it i have been up for over 24 hours
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
