Rob Thompson wrote: > Best I can say is this...from my last reply. And this is the last I'll > say. I can see my opinion is far from popular. > > If they were selling Anthrax, I wouldn't have said a word. _THAT_ is > different.
Huh? You really are seriously deluded... > Freaking handbags!!! So what are you really upset about here? That you don't understand that the fact you can even use a fucking computer and post these messages means you're up to your eyeballs in consumerist hyprocrisy, or that you really just don't like handbags and/or their makers/sellers? The fact that it is Louis Vuitton and fake handbags is pretty much entirely irrelevant. The interesting aspect of this ruling is that it (like several others, in slightly different behavioural domains) has affirmed (for those who are so pig-ignorant as to not recognize it) that "online behaviour" is (largely) ruled by the same laws, customs and so on as "real world" behaviours. Is _that_ what you don't like? If you really thought that just because computers, "virtual communities" and other such electronic ephemeera were involved that somehow all this "int-duh-web stuff" was magically "different" or "special", then maybe _you_ are the "special" one??? Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
