Oh the jurisdiction is clear.  All of those countries have it.  The 
problem is getting the defendant to appear in court.

j

der Mouse wrote:
>> The interesting aspect of this ruling is that it [...] has affirmed
>> [...] that "online behaviour" is (largely) ruled by the same laws,
>> customs and so on as "real world" behaviours.
>>     
>
> Except it hasn't, because it isn't.  At least not in general.
>
> "Online" behaviour _is_ ruled by the same laws and customs as off-net
> behaviour when all, or at least enough, of the parties are in the same
> (off-net) jurisdiction.  _That_ is what this ruling has affirmed.
>
> But, unlike offline behaviour, on-the-net behaviour is very often
> thoroughly cross-jurisdictional, with no clear way to determine whose
> laws apply.  Someone in Germany buys from a Japanese company through an
> Egyptian-hosted website paying with a US payment broker and the product
> ships from Brazil, and it's, um, a little less clear.
>
> Nor do you really want it otherwise, I suspect, because I suspect that
> most of your - and my, and just about everyone else's - on-net actions
> are illegal _somewhere_.  Unless you expect to enforce your laws
> against others but are unwilling to accept reciprocal enforcement of
> others' laws againt you.
>
>   
>> If you really thought that just because computers, "virtual
>> communities" and other such electronic ephemeera were involved that
>> somehow all this "int-duh-web stuff" was magically "different" or
>> "special", then maybe _you_ are the "special" one???
>>     
>
> Not just because they're involved, but because they are fundamentally
> different.  See by blah entry on the subject,
> http://ftp.rodents-montreal.org/mouse/blah/2009-09-08-1.html,
> if you're interested in my thoughts on the matter.
>
> /~\ The ASCII                           Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
>  X  Against HTML              [email protected]
> / \ Email!         7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>   

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to