Read the CFDJ article. I don't think Patrick has been
following the recent developments with Fusebox. Many
of the areas he says it does not support are now
supported. AND, I just went to the iiframework site in
Netscape 4 and it doesn't show up. I am interested to
read more about it, but I guess I have to use IE...

The article really did read more like an ad than a
scientific comparasion. Shame on the CFDJ.

Nate

--- Billy Cravens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I mistakenly referred to Patrick as the
> "president" of the
> DFWCFUG; he's actually a co-chairman (along with
> Dave Cahall of
> Stonebridge)
> 
> -Billy Cravens
> 
> Billy Cravens wrote:
> > 
> > Yes, the author of the article (Patrick Steil) is
> the president of
> > Infrastructure, the creator iiFramework.  I know
> Patrick; he's the
> > president of our CFUG (Dallas/Fort Worth)
> > 
> > However, I would not look at the article as a
> pro/con for Fusebox.
> > iiFramework is a framework (obviously), whereas
> FuseBox is a
> > methodology.  Patrick did a good job in one of our
> meetings in pointing
> > out the difference between methodologies and
> frameworks; his point was
> > that developers need frameworks, not just
> methodology.  However, I don't
> > believe he means to take a stance against a
> particular methodology; as a
> > matter of fact, iiFramework integrates several
> Fusebox principles into
> > the framework.
> > 
> > -Billy Cravens
> > 
> > Bob Silverberg wrote:
> > >
> > > Personally, I'd take that article with a grain
> of salt.  It seems to smile
> > > very kindly on iiFramework, to the detriment of
> the other methodologies -
> > > and I believe that it was written by the
> president of the company that is
> > > selling iiFramework.
> > >
> > > I don't mean to cast any aspersions on that
> individual, but I think it's bad
> > > form on CFDJ's part.  I would expect an article
> that portrays itself as a
> > > review to be at least somewhat unbiased.  It is
> hard to remain unbiased when
> > > you stand to gain financially if one of the
> methodologies reviewed is chosen
> > > by the reader.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents,
> > > Bob
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Neil Peaslee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: January 8, 2001 10:00 AM
> > > To: Fusebox
> > > Subject: RE: arguments **against** fusebox
> > >
> > > Rob,
> > > There is a good article that compares different
> cold fusion application
> > > frameworks (and fusebox as a methodology) in
> sys-con's ColdFusion
> > > Developer's Journal. The article list pros and
> cons of each
> > > framework/methodology.
> > >
> > > You can find the article at
> http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/
> > > Just go to 'featured articles' in the left
> column and then click on the
> > > article titled 'Propel Your ColdFusion Projects
> with Application Frameworks'
> > > in Volume: 2 Issue: 11.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rob Schuff
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 1:01 PM
> > > > To: Fusebox
> > > > Subject: arguments **against** fusebox
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Greetings folks,
> > > >
> > > > As a newcomer to CF and even newer to fusebox
> I am seeking all the info I
> > > > can possibly digest.  Fusebox certainly looks
> like a solid
> > > > methodology, but
> > > > like anyone reviewing such a methodology, I
> would like to see
> > > > "both sides of
> > > > the coin".  Can anyone point me to criticisms/
> perceived weaknesses (valid
> > > > or not) of FB?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > rob
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Robert Schuff                                 
>      Bull Run Software
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]                         
>       Portland, OR USA
> > > >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to