> There is a good article that compares different cold fusion application > frameworks (and fusebox as a methodology) in sys-con's ColdFusion > Developer's Journal. The article list pros and cons of each > framework/methodology. As others have pointed out, the "good" of the article is questionable. If nothing else, it contains one completely false statement that could have been checked with virtually no effort... Fuseboxed sites *can* and routinely *are* indexed by search engines. -- Roger ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Roger B.
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Patrick McElhaney
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox craig girard
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Patrick McElhaney
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Carla Shafer
- RE: arguments **against** fus... Patrick McElhaney
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Neil Peaslee
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Bob Silverberg
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox Billy Cravens
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox Billy Cravens
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Roger B.
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Mike Craig
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Roger B.
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox moonerent
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Matthew J. Vecera
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Adam Reynolds
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Hal Helms
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Phillip Harrington
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox Nathan Shaw
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox Rob Schuff
- help! passing user_id w/page submitted to itself Jim Priest
