Well, this sure has turned into quite a dialog. thanks for all the response to my original query. I am glad to see others had the same opinion that CFDJ's decision was at best, unprofessional. I found the article uninformative and was quite shocked really to see who the author was given the subject matter. rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Fusebox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 11:13 AM Subject: Re: arguments **against** fusebox > > The article really did read more like an ad than a > scientific comparasion. Shame on the CFDJ. > > Nate > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox Billy Cravens
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Roger B.
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Mike Craig
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Roger B.
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox moonerent
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Matthew J. Vecera
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Adam Reynolds
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Hal Helms
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Phillip Harrington
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox Nathan Shaw
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox JME Maxwell
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Michel Vuijlsteke
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Kola Oyedeji
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Michel Vuijlsteke
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox McCollough, Alan
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox craig girard
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Mike Craig
- Re: arguments **against** fusebox moonerent
- RE: arguments **against** fusebox Benjamin S. Rogers
