Actually, I mistakenly referred to Patrick as the "president" of the
DFWCFUG; he's actually a co-chairman (along with Dave Cahall of
Stonebridge)
-Billy Cravens
Billy Cravens wrote:
>
> Yes, the author of the article (Patrick Steil) is the president of
> Infrastructure, the creator iiFramework. I know Patrick; he's the
> president of our CFUG (Dallas/Fort Worth)
>
> However, I would not look at the article as a pro/con for Fusebox.
> iiFramework is a framework (obviously), whereas FuseBox is a
> methodology. Patrick did a good job in one of our meetings in pointing
> out the difference between methodologies and frameworks; his point was
> that developers need frameworks, not just methodology. However, I don't
> believe he means to take a stance against a particular methodology; as a
> matter of fact, iiFramework integrates several Fusebox principles into
> the framework.
>
> -Billy Cravens
>
> Bob Silverberg wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I'd take that article with a grain of salt. It seems to smile
> > very kindly on iiFramework, to the detriment of the other methodologies -
> > and I believe that it was written by the president of the company that is
> > selling iiFramework.
> >
> > I don't mean to cast any aspersions on that individual, but I think it's bad
> > form on CFDJ's part. I would expect an article that portrays itself as a
> > review to be at least somewhat unbiased. It is hard to remain unbiased when
> > you stand to gain financially if one of the methodologies reviewed is chosen
> > by the reader.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents,
> > Bob
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Peaslee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: January 8, 2001 10:00 AM
> > To: Fusebox
> > Subject: RE: arguments **against** fusebox
> >
> > Rob,
> > There is a good article that compares different cold fusion application
> > frameworks (and fusebox as a methodology) in sys-con's ColdFusion
> > Developer's Journal. The article list pros and cons of each
> > framework/methodology.
> >
> > You can find the article at http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/
> > Just go to 'featured articles' in the left column and then click on the
> > article titled 'Propel Your ColdFusion Projects with Application Frameworks'
> > in Volume: 2 Issue: 11.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rob Schuff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 1:01 PM
> > > To: Fusebox
> > > Subject: arguments **against** fusebox
> > >
> > >
> > > Greetings folks,
> > >
> > > As a newcomer to CF and even newer to fusebox I am seeking all the info I
> > > can possibly digest. Fusebox certainly looks like a solid
> > > methodology, but
> > > like anyone reviewing such a methodology, I would like to see
> > > "both sides of
> > > the coin". Can anyone point me to criticisms/ perceived weaknesses (valid
> > > or not) of FB?
> > >
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > rob
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Robert Schuff Bull Run Software
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Portland, OR USA
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
