> Steve is right; documenting post-development is pointless; > Fusedocing up front is powerful.
Pointless? That's a bit extreme, isn't it? Benjamin S. Rogers http://www.c4.net/ v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 On 23 May 2002 at 9:32, Wally Randall wrote: > > I would like to raise an heretical issue. WHO USES FUSEDOCS? At > various user group > meetings I have discussed the use of Fusebox. Everyone seems to be using the coding > methodology by NO ONE is using FUSEDOCS! The coders are structuring their code with > Fusebox but not taking the time to use the design methods inherent in the development of > FUSEDOCS. > > This has certainly been true in the last two large Fusebox projects I > have been involved in. The > developers do not want to spend 'coding time' developing Fusedocs and the managers have no > interest in spending development time engaged in that level of planning detail. > > How are various developers planning their sites if they are not using > FUSEDOCS? > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Wallace Randall > ICQ#:157983785 > Current ICQ status: > > > + More ways to contact me > __________________________________________________________________ ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
