> Is it? Knowing how much weight a steel beam can hold seems pretty > pointless to me.... if the building has already collapsed.
I'm not questioning Fusedocs value as a planning tool. However, if I'm going to go back to something previously developed, I want an accurate definition of what a piece of logic does. A description of what a component was supposed to do is only so useful because the template could have been edited by other developers and the documentation not updated. To this date, I have never seen an application that was accurately documented and religiously update, no matter what method was used during its development and maintenance before I got my hands on it. It just doesn't seem to happen on the scale in which I work. Even my own efforts are lacking, but I try. To this extent, I'm very excited about the CFC explorer. I'm even excited about the possibility of integrating Fusedocs with CFCs, though that is a project for another day. :) Benjamin S. Rogers http://www.c4.net/ v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 "Benjamin S. Rogers" wrote: > > > Steve is right; documenting post-development is pointless; > > Fusedocing up front is powerful. > > Pointless? That's a bit extreme, isn't it? > > Benjamin S. Rogers > http://www.c4.net/ > v.508.240.0051 > f.508.240.0057 > > On 23 May 2002 at 9:32, Wally Randall wrote: > > > > > I would like to raise an heretical issue. WHO USES FUSEDOCS? At > > various user group meetings I have discussed the use of Fusebox. > > Everyone seems to be > using the coding > > methodology by NO ONE is using FUSEDOCS! The coders are structuring > their code with > > Fusebox but not taking the time to use the design methods inherent > > in > the development of > > FUSEDOCS. > > > > This has certainly been true in the last two large Fusebox projects > > I have been involved in. The developers do not want to spend 'coding > > time' developing Fusedocs and > the managers have no > > interest in spending development time engaged in that level of > planning detail. > > > > How are various developers planning their sites if they are not > > using FUSEDOCS? > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > > Wallace Randall > > ICQ#:157983785 > > Current ICQ status: > > > > > > + More ways to contact me > > __________________________________________________________________ > ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
