Chris, You said:
" It would be a big interference to abolish any and all regulations . . " You mean that in our 75,000 pages of the Federal Register you cannot imagine abolishing one regulation? You must have been in one of Arthur's classes. Wow! Harry ******************************************** Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 Tel: 818 352-4141 -- Fax: 818 353-2242 http://haledward.home.comcast.net ******************************************** -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph Reuss Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Futurework] Future of our Species Harry Pollard wrote: > Chris uses free trade (the absence of interference) to > describe both national and international interference. "Absence of interference" is an illusion. It would be a big interference to abolish any and all regulations -->FT. Worse, the resulting wild-west chaos, pollution etc. would be a very big interference into everyone's life. Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword "igve". --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.552 / Virus Database: 344 - Release Date: 12/15/2003 _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
