On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 09:16:20AM +1000, Kathryn Andersen wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 06:04:48PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > > I will of course be responsible for keeping this branch synched so that its > > eventual merging with the tip of HEAD will be seamless [0]. > > > > -- Thomas Adam > > > > [0] This is CVS -- what am I saying? It's going to suck. :P Oh, if only > > we were using Git... > > It wouldn't be impossible to change over; CVS -> SVN -> GIT > I know, I know, it would still be a huge and painful effort. > > Would it make sense to make a clean break with 2.60? Leave the old > stuff in CVS, but on the 2.60 release, start with a completely new git > repository containing just the released 2.60 code, and continue on from > there?
Sometimes, questions are meant to be rhetorical. :) -- Thomas Adam -- "It was the cruelest game I've ever played and it's played inside my head." -- "Hush The Warmth", Gorky's Zygotic Mynci.
