On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:21:26AM +0100, Andre Bonhote wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:19:35AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > Dominik, be honest: Does the default configuration fvwm2 comes with look > beautiful in your opinion? I mean, if you have a nice and shiny website, > you should maybe think about using another default config for future > releases.
That's what I have said for years. The default config makes new users run off screaming in panic. But let's move this topic out of this thread. > I know, this is OT, but it just came to my mind. Would it be possible to > have the website look like fvwm2? Or/and have fvwm2 by default look like > the website? This is maybe crazy, but, yeah! why not? I had the same idea. A web page surrounded by a themable window border, with the menu in the title bar :-) Would be fitting for a window manager. Or perhaps with a pager to navigate the sub pages? > Just an idea. I really do _not_ like the default look of fvwm2. I could > imagine that a new user would be quite shocked ... (sorry to the creator > of that "theme", but it's my taste). Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
