On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:39:10PM -0400, Bob Woodside wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:55:47 +0000 > Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 22 Apr 2003 17:08:08 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > > > ... but currently we have no logo on the page. This is a must. > > > > But we will have a new logo only on August 1 accourding to > > your plan.
First of September. > > I prefer to be without a logo for now than with the old > > fvwm_smaller.gif. Come on, we lived with it for years. At least the new design should have a defined place for the new logo. > Just out of curiosity, am I the only one who doesn't dislike the old > logo intensely? Not that I don't think having a new one is a good idea > for the 10th anniversary, but I never disliked the old one. Any other > opinions? It's red. Isn't that bad enough? ;-) Seriously, I personally don't care about how the logo looks since I don't use logos. But I guess that it is at least partially responsible if people turn away from fvwm quickly after loading the fvwm home page. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
