On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:01:13PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 22 Apr 2003 16:44:02 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:12:14AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > > Dominik Vogt <fvwm-workers@fvwm.org> writes: > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 08:38:23AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > > > > Dominik Vogt <fvwm-workers@fvwm.org> writes: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:02:41PM +0200, Uwe Pross wrote: > > > > > > > On 22 Apr 2003 at 12:57:54 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > > How about eliminating the title on the background? > > > > > It doesn't fit into the desktop metaphor. > > > > > > > > Agreed, but on the other pages we need some place for a prominent > > > > page title. > > > > > > Why can't all the pages use the titlebar for the page title. > > > > I don't disagree in principle. It's just that a 12 point font in > > a window title does not match my definition of 'prominent'. We'd > > have to blow up the window title to a ridiculous height, including > > the buttons. > > Good point. > > Although I can't deny, it is a bit over-titled, I think every title may > have its function, if no, it may be empty. > > Waiting for Uwe to show another layout, but I am ok with the current one.
... but currently we have no logo on the page. This is a must. > I think pages with several windows are ok when appropriate. No problem here. By the way, I think the pager should have a normal window border, perhaps three pixels wide. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
