On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:52:51PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote:
> Dominik Vogt <fvwm-workers@fvwm.org> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 05:11:31PM +0200, Uwe Pross wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > On 29 Apr 2003 at 10:45:38 -0400, Bob Woodside wrote:
> > > BTW: The total size I have given was not correct. I have
> > >   forgotten the window decoration pictures. They come to
> > >   another 25 kByte.
> > 
> > Wow, 25kB?  Why are they so big?
> 
> Using tcpdump, it doesn't look like it sends the pictures.
> It looks like the client requests the image but supplies a timestamp
> for the last image that it has, and the server responds that the image
> hasn't changed.  The message from the client is 568 bytes
> and the response is 96.
> 
> I see it getting about 23 images.
> 
> I think most of these are the images in the pager.

I think it's not the size of the images that slows down loading.
It seems that the images are requested sequentially.

Bye

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

 --
Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to