Another additional point to ponder is that FW-1 performance on NT, Solaris,
and Linux can greatly increase when using a software-based solution like
Rainwall to cluster additional FW-1 servers.
Best regards,
Jules Veloria
Rainfinity
1901 Landings Drive
Mountain View, CA 94043
(W) 650-404-9824
(M) 650-279-8787
(F) 650-404-9877
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rainfinity.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Shimon Silberschlag
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 3:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [FW1] FW-1 performance on different platforms
>
>
>
> Recently I came across the following performance data at CP's web site
> http://www.checkpoint.com/products/firewall-1/pbrief.html
>
> To say the least, I was surprised to find out that NT surpasses the
> Nokia platform performance wise, and that the fastest platform is the
> Linux newcomer. (pay attention to the fact that the platforms are
> different in CPU power and the number of the CPUs)
>
> Is Nokia going to respond by giving us a faster box, after all the box
> should be streamlined for routing and firewalling, utilizing the well
> known BSD based TCP stack.
>
> Does the list group experience on the field resembles the results CP
> got in the lab?
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Shimon Silberschlag
>
>
>
> ==================================================================
> ==============
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ==================================================================
> ==============
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
