Mostly they own 24.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 I don't know if they own it all, but a
good portion.  I know mediaone, @home, and time warner are all on
24.0.0.0/255.0.0.0.  I'm not sure if they are all the same network.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 5:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [FW1] @Home ban of VPN's




Does anyone know if there are specific IP ranges associated with
Comcast@Home?
We have several hundred SR users in the US and I'm sure most of them ignore
email from their ISP.. I'd like to run a report on our fw logs to get users
names that may be impacted by this new policy.


-Gary




|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Michael      |
|        |          Doleman      |
|        |          <MDoleman@hcd|
|        |          .ca.gov>     |
|        |                       |
|        |          08/15/2000   |
|        |          04:40 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->
 
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
  |       cc:     (bcc: Gary Cunninghame)
|
  |       Subject:     RE: [FW1] @Home ban of VPN's
|
 
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|





I contacted @Home this afternoon--I had been scheduled for installation this
week. Needless to say, I cancelled my order.

Bottom line is that they DO intend to implement a policy of banning VPN
traffic over their network for @Home subscribers. How they intend to enforce
such a policy effectively is open to speculation.

I was given a few explanations as to why they intend to ban VPN. The first
was that they "don't support networks." Funny, eh? Second was that it
requires too much bandwidth. Finally, the "@Home network is intended for
business use." I.e., they clearly want people to pay-up for the "@Work"
service in order to do VPN from home.

Michael Doleman

P.S.--When I first called today and mentioned VPN, the rep. declared that
"we've been getting slammed with calls like this..." I suspect that if
people keep the pressure on them, we'll see a rapid retreat from the policy.



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to