That's insignificant, he didn't test some frameworks on a personal computer with Windows Vista and other frameworks on a supercomputer; his test was perfectly fair. Absolute results of that benchmark are insignificant, you should care about relative results.
As I've already said (I quote myself) ekerazha wrote: > > Are you (and other professed software architects) saying that there's a > "Windows Vista-way" and a "Linux way" for PHP programming? PHP is a high > level interpreted language, should I believe that you have 2 different > software engineering strategies if you deploy a *PHP* application on a > Windows system or on a Linux system? "PHP for Linux": nice. Please, don't > let us laugh, that's just ridiculous. > Somebody wrote some code because he thought it was good code. Now somebody else shows that your framework is slower than another framework on Windows Vista: you have to blame your code, not Windows Vista, because the other framework was on Windows Vista too... and yes, it was faster and "probably" it will be faster on every other operating system. Remember, "relative results". We could discuss about the PHP version (maybe you have optimized your code for the last PHP version), but this discussion about to-Windows-or-not-to-Windows (from you and other people) is simply valueless. But if you prefer your theory, you could add a "PHP for Linux" label to your apps ;-) Isaak Malik-3 wrote: > > You're viewing it from the viewpoint, that sentence was not about the > scripting language itself not was it about the frameworks specifically. It > was about the fact that web applications perform much worser on an > everyday-computer vs a production server. > > Since these benchmarks were performed on an everyday-computer they hold > very > little truth, not only because of the possibility of other running > software > inflicting the results (see my benchmarks) but also because these numbers > would be much different from the benchmarks performed on a Linux > production > server. > > And if one would perform benchmarks on a Windows server then you should at > least use the most common software combination of a real-time production > server which would be Windows + IIS and not Windows + Apache. > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:46 PM, ekerazha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> Martin Martinov-2 wrote: >> > >> > The bare fact that they say the tests were run on a windows vista pc >> > says much by itself :-) >> > >> >> Are you (and other professed software architects) saying that there's a >> "Windows Vista-way" and a "Linux way" for PHP programming? PHP is a high >> level interpreted language, should I believe that you have 2 different >> software engineering strategies if you deploy a *PHP* application on a >> Windows system or on a Linux system? "PHP for Linux": nice. Please, don't >> let us laugh, that's just ridiculous. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Framework-speed-shotout----question-tp19914787p20293638.html >> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Isaak Malik > Web Developer > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Framework-speed-shotout----question-tp19914787p20300498.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
