On Jul 26, 2005, at 12:54, Brian McEwen wrote:
On Jul 26, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
Think of iTunes and iPhoto as database applications. The database
backend in this case happens to be a filesystem you can traverse with
Finder, but just as you wouldn't, under normal circumstances, use
MySQL/4D/Oracle client as your database application (you'd use a
front-end application, not a back-end one), you should use the
front-end iPhoto or iTunes, not the back-end Finder.
I have 20,000+ photos to organize. IPhoto has proven incapable of
managing that many photos without data loss and lots of lag.
Not to mention the permanent color shifting bug in the last version.
No thanks!
It may be fine for smaller collections, but there's no way I'm
trusting my data to it.
Well, I have about 5,000 in mine - no problems so far.
I get it now: what you want isn't a replacement for iPhoto - you want a
pro version of iPhoto.
Daniel
--
G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! |
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
--> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to: <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com
