Hi Dannon, Thanks for the pointers. I am new to developing to galaxy and any help or guidance would be much appreciated. Are there any docs to help me understand how to code/debug galaxy? And if you have any suggestions for the general process of extending the API i would be very grateful. thanks, Richard
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Dannon Baker <dannonba...@me.com> wrote: > Richard, > > You're correct in that currently the workflow API affords no method for > runtime modification of tool parameters, other than inputs. Depending on > your needs, it might be feasible to have a few static workflows that you > reuse often via the workflow API. If that isn't the case, and you think it'd > be likely that you'll want to, say, programmatically modify parameters at > runtime based on input data heuristics, then the API does need to be > extended. The first place to look at would be > lib/galaxy/web/controllers/workflow.py (run() method), to see the general > approach to running workflows and providing parameters in the existing > infrastructure. Then, see the API version at lib/galaxy/web/api/workflows.py > (create() method) for a comparison. > > Let me know if you need any help with this at all. Once it's done, if you're > willing, we'd certainly like to merge the changes back in and include the > functionality in the base galaxy distribution. > > -Dannon > > > > > On Dec 5, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Richard Park wrote: > >> Hello, >> I was wondering what would be the best way to extend Galaxy's API >> functionality to allow for runtime modification of tool parameters? >> >> I have successfully been able to run workflows programmatically using >> the API, following the basic steps in: >> scripts/api/execute_workflow.py. >> scripts/api/example_watch_folder.py >> >> However, it is unclear to me, what would be the best way to run >> workflows through API with specific parameters at various steps. >> Should I generate new workflows for every workflow that requires >> different parameters and upload this to galaxy? Or would it be better >> to extend the API to allow for runtime parameter configuration? If >> this is the case, any pointers on how to extend this would be greatly >> appreciated. >> >> Thank you, >> Richard Park >> ___________________________________________________________ >> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" >> in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this >> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: >> >> http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ > ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
