rich
You have actually, hit the nail on the head, as we say here in the United Kingdom mate, :) Thomas is not happy, i repeat not, happy to put his name to a sidescroller Given the setbacks, all he wants is to make this game thomases game, not soeone elses game who ripped us all off. He wants to put thomas ward created this, sort of, stamp on the game if you see what i mean. That's all this is about. why should he slave away to satisfy a few this is sick i tell you, sick you lot who moan don't deserve to be allowed to buy from any company again who make games, as you jsut wining dot dot dots On 21 Mar 2008, at 23:22, Richard sherman wrote: > Hi, > > I agree with Charles. > > Thom, you are a fine person and a valued contributor and programmer. > > I too would suggest that you produce the side scroller. But don't just > throw something out there for two reasons. > > 1. You would not like it. > > 2. your customers would not like it. > > You take pride in what you do, so make something that you can be > proud of, > as well as your customers will like. Revamp the old Monty game in > such a way > as to comply with the cease and desist order, yet is a game that you > will be > proud to put your name on. Then after that has been done, use your > game > engine to make the 3 d version you always wanted to create. > > Or, take an unscientific off list poll from only those who have > pre-purchased the game and see what they say and go from there. > > Again, do what you want and be true to yourself. I appreciate the > updates > and am pretty sure that most of us do. > > rich > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Charles Rivard > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 5:30 PM > > > Actually, why can't we have the new game as well as the old. The > old is > first finished, then comes the new. I'm excited about both, and I > don't see > why they can't coexist. I support Thomas in his creation of the 3D > game, > but all in good time. Complete one project that has long been > waited for, > then work on the next. Get one game out of the way, be done with > it, then > work on what's in the future. If a game is half completed, and it > was paid > for, crank it out, fine tune it through beta testing, and distribute > it. > Gamers who have not bought it yet just might do so, and those who have > already bought it get what they paid for. And, hopefully, all > supportive > gamers will continue to be supportive based on this course of > action, as he > will be aiming to please the paying customers. I am open to how my > thoughts > are unreasonable. I don't expect the game to be out in a day, a > week, a > month, or any designated time. As long as it is still being worked > on, and > effort is made to get it to those of us who are willing to wait, > that's > fine. But to seemingly drop it in midproduction is not the right > way to go. > > --- > Laughter is the best medicine. Look around you and find a dose. > > > --- > Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org > If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > . > You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at > http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org. > All messages are archived and can be searched and read at > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of > the list, > please send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org. All messages are archived and can be searched and read at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list, please send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
