On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:10:02PM -0700, Matt Massie wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 10:29, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > Partial success on FreeBSD 5-CURRENT, unless this is supposed to be a v6 > > only test. It's only binding to :: not 127.0.0.1. See below for my tests. > > > > Some thoughts on using apr. In general, I like the idea. The > > config.layout feature looks really nice! However, apr is big so it > > would be nice it we could have an option to use an external verion of > > apr, for instance when built in the FreeBSD ports collection. The > > tarball is also rather gigantic with apr. Perhaps two distrubtions > > would be in order, one with all the deps for lazy people/broken package > > systems, and one with just the core for people who already have the deps > > are can get them easily. > > that is already in the design of this framework. this is a request that > preston smith (the other freebsd guru) asked for quiet a while back and > it makes a lot of sense. > > % ./configure --help > ... > --with-apr=DIR|FILE prefix for installed APR, path to APR build > tree, > or the full path to apr-config > --with-apr-util=DIR prefix for installed APU, or path to APU build > tree > > this allows package maintainers to decide if they want to use the > packaged apr/apr-util or instead create a dependency in their package on > the external library.
Excellent! > if you are worried about the size of the package... i guess we could > have a (with srclib and without srclib setup). i don't think a couple > meg download should be much of a problem though... even 5 megs. I agree and disagree. On one hand,it's only a few MB out of .5+GB of dist files on my machine. On the other hand, that's a few more minutes I can't use very productively every time I have to download the source (I'm stuck with IDSL here). > > [10:22am] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (~/working/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0/gmond): > > sockstat| grep gmon > > brooks gmond 23960 3 tcp6 *:8021 *:* > > [10:22am] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (~/working/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0/gmond): telnet > > localhost 8021 > > Trying ::1... > > Connected to localhost. > > Escape character is '^]'. > > Server socket: ::1:8021 -> ::1:49506 > > Connection closed by foreign host. > > it looks like localhost is resolving to an IPv6 address. > > > [10:22am] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (~/working/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0/gmond): telnet > > :: 8021 Trying ::... > > Connected to ::. > > Escape character is '^]'. > > Server socket: ::1:8021 -> ::1:49507 > > Connection closed by foreign host. > > good. > > > [10:22am] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (~/working/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0/gmond): telnet > > 0 8021 > > Trying 0.0.0.0... > > telnet: connect to address 0.0.0.0: Connection refused > > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > expected. > > > [10:23am] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (~/working/ganglia/ganglia-2.6.0/gmond): telnet > > 127.0.0.1 8021 > > Trying 127.0.0.1... > > telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused > > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > this is strange and not what i would expect (or found on other operating > systems). hmmmm. are you running any ip filters on the box? I found the problem. FreeBSD is intentionally violating RFC2553 because they (KAME) feel it is dangerous. There are two solutions to this. One is to enable IPv4-mapped IPv6 address support via a socket option. The other is to explicitly try to bind both v4 and v6 sockets. This is documented in the "Interaction between IPv4/v6 sockets" section of the inet6(4) manpage: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=inet6 The sockopt is IPV6_V6ONLY which is documented in ip6(4): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ip6 -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
pgpTlGV3XXKyS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
