>>> On 8/8/2008 at 9:59 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Kostas Georgiou
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It will obviously be easier for all packagers to have easilly accessible
>> patches instead of having to backport them from the trunk :). It might be
>> better though to just get a new release out every lets say a couple of
>> weeks if any such patches are available to avoid confusing situations
>> where fedora is at 3.1.n + patch{1,2,4}, debian at 3.1.n + patch{1,3,4} etc.
>> Both options require the same amount of time spend in my part so I don't
>> have a strong preference either way.
>
> Can we freeze what we are doing in 3.1.x branch (or freeze in the next
> few days), go through a 2 week testing cycle and release that as 3.1.1
> (or early September as Brad originally mentioned).
>
> For folks who haven't already upgraded, waiting a little bit more is
> not going to kill them.
>
> For those who have already upgraded, we have a patch available...
>
> What do you guys think?
>
I think that is a good idea although we should get all of the proposed
backports done first and then try to tag a 3.1.1 tarball.
Brad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
