On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Brian (Mushkin) wrote:
> I have the same setup from my ISP. It works fine although under 'NAT ->
> Aliases', GNATBox tells me "...IP Address is on unique network". No
You should add the netmask for the first entry in an otherwise undefined
network.
For example, I have 4 aliases:
10.50.1.5
10.50.1.6
10.60.1.7
10.60.1.8
My physical interface has 10.50.1.4/24 assigned, so there is no need to
assign a netmask for the two 10.50.1.0/24 addresses. (the gnatbox
automaticly adds a /32 netmask, or 255.255.255.255)
10.60.1.0/24 is not defined elsewhere, though, and the NAT>Aliases entry
is the first definition for the network. I should define a netmask in the
entry, then, using:
10.61.1.7/24
10.60.1.8 will not need a netmask.
Done this way, the warning you mention will go away, and local-network
routing will be handled properly.
...david
--
David Raistrick
Systems Administrator - Global Technology Associates, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are the opinions of
David Raistrick, not necessarily those of GTA, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive: http://archives.gnatbox.com/gb-users/
