https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359
--- Comment #41 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #40) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #39) > > The culprit for the second problem is r264358, exposed only once the > > original problem is fixed, i.e. with the patch of r264485 (tested on both > > reproducers). > > > > It would have been better to open a new PR for it, but it's probably too > > late!-( > > Yes, I left this open to Paul. You could still disentangle, you have my > blessings. The problem is caused by my being too brutal in gfc_is_reallocatable_lhs. I have a patch which is just now regtesting. I will post it here once it is done. Paul
