https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359

--- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> The test succeeds with r264348+patch of r264485, but not with r264349+patch.

I make a mistake in my bissection: r264349+patch is OK as well as
r264357+patch, but not r264358+patch.

Reply via email to