https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359
--- Comment #35 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #34) > > Created attachment 44739 [details] > > Reproducer for the second problem. > > The test succeeds with r264348+patch of r264485, but not with r264349+patch. > > IMO it would be better to open a new PR for it (and close this one as FIXED). I am working with r264501 at the moment. I am in the procedure of further reducing the reproducer but I think it is rather obvious what goes wrong.
