https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113960
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot ibm.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > We can't use memcmp if the sizes are different. We don't want to use the > min, we want to guard that code with the sizes being the same, then we can > just use len*sizeof(*first1) because we know it's the same as > sizeof(*first2). Hehe I was about to add another comment. I just confused myself with taking the minimum but we rather need to ensure that we are walking over same sized integers. LGTM
