Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 09:31, Po Lu wrote:
>> (BTW, I thought implicit int was being discussed, not implicit
>> function declarations, but here goes.)
>
> Then you're not paying attention, the very first mail in the thread
> starts by saying:
>
> TL;DR: This message is about turning implicit-int,
^^^^^^^^^^^^
> implicit-function-declaration, and possibly int-conversion into errors
> for GCC 14.
It says right there that implicit-int is being discussed. I missed the
part about implicit function declarations.
> Please educate yourself about the topic.
Evidently (from the rest of my follow-up), I already did.
