Kirill Kononenko wrote: > Do I understand it correctly that there are no useful thoughts or > ideas with-out- flaming and flooding about LLVM?
I will admit that I don't have any ideas, but I thought there were a couple
of positive suggestions in there.
It's possible there's a bit of "library fatigue" going on. GCC does seem to
keep sprouting new ones!
cheers,
DaveK
