Hello Everyone
Do I understand it correctly that there are no useful thoughts or ideas with flamimg and flooding about LLVM? Thanks, Kirill 2009/4/1 Kirill Kononenko <kirill.konone...@gmail.com>: > Please, let collect together all useful ideas and concrete thoughts? I > am sure many people already have thought about which JITing support > GCC users need. I also do have my thoughts about this research topic > but I would like also to have useful feedback from people who also > understand this research topic like me and gcc internals. Please also > stop flaming about LLVM. > > > > Thanks, > Kirill > > > 2009/4/1 Kirill Kononenko <kirill.konone...@gmail.com>: >> 2009/4/1 Daniel Berlin <dber...@dberlin.org>: >>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Kirill Kononenko >>> <kirill.konone...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello Dear GCC Developers, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I would like to ask your opinion about possibility for integration of >>>> the libJIT Just-In-Time compilation library and GCC. For example, the >>>> same way as libffi is integrated within gcc source tree. It seems to >>>> me that LLVM solves many goals that are already complete and solved in >>>> GCC. So I think libJIT potentially is more useful for GCC and software >>>> developers. >>>> >>> Highly disagree. >>> >>>> >>>> What is your opinion about this idea? How this should be done and what >>>> improvements could be made to both libJIT and GCC for this kind of >>>> integration? >>> >>> I don't think we should integrate libJIT into GCC. It doesn't solve >>> any of the *interesting* JIT problems we would have, it only solves >> >> What are exactly the *interesting* JIT problems you have? And who are >> exactly "we" again in this case? Is it Google? Or you personally speak >> for all GCC user community? >> >>> the ones we know how to solve in a fairly short time (given enough >>> developers). >> >> Do you actually have these extra 'enough developers'? >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Kirill >> >
